Everything about If And Only If totally explained
↔
⇔
≡logical symbols
representing iff.
If and only if, in
logic and fields that rely on it such as
mathematics and
philosophy, is a
logical connective between statements which means that the truth of either one of the statements requires the truth of the other. Thus, either both statements are true, or both are false. To put it another way, the first statement will always be true when the second statement is, and will
only be true under those conditions.
In writing, common alternative phrases to "if and only if" include
iff,
Q is necessary and sufficient for P, P is equivalent to Q, P precisely if Q, P precisely (or exactly) when Q, P exactly in case Q, and
P just in case Q. Many authors regard "iff" as unsuitable in formal writing; others use it freely.
The statement "(P iff Q)" is equivalent to the statement "not (P
xor Q)" or "P == Q" in computer science.
In
logic formulas, logical symbols are used instead of these phrases; see the discussion of notation.
Definition
The
truth table of
p iff q (also written as
p ↔ q) is as follows:
Iff>
| p |
q | p ↔ q
|
| T |
T |
T |
| T |
F |
F |
| F |
T |
F |
| F |
F |
T |
Usage
Notation
The corresponding logical symbols are "↔", "⇔" and "≡", and sometimes "iff". These are usually treated as equivalent. However, some texts of
mathematical logic (particularly those on
first-order logic, rather than
propositional logic) make a distinction between these, in which the first, ↔, is used as a symbol in logic formulas, while ⇔ is used in reasoning about those logic formulas (for example, in
metalogic).
Another term for this
logical connective is
exclusive nor.
Proofs
In most
logical systems, one
proves a statement of the form "P iff Q" by proving "if P, then Q" and "if Q, then P" (or the
inverse of "if P, then Q", for example "if not P, then not Q"). Proving this pair of statements sometimes leads to a more natural proof, since there are not obvious conditions in which one would infer a biconditional directly. An alternative is to prove the
disjunction "(P and Q) or (not-P and not-Q)", which itself can be inferred directly from either of its disjuncts — that is, because "iff" is
truth-functional, "P iff Q" follows if P and Q have both been shown true, or both false.
Origin of the abbreviation
Usage of the abbreviation "iff" first appeared in print in
John L. Kelley's
1955 book
General Topology.
Its invention is often credited to the
mathematician Paul Halmos, but in his
autobiography he states that he borrowed it from
puzzlers.
The difference between if, only if, and iff
Examples
- Madison will eat pudding if the pudding is a custard. (equivalently: If the pudding is a custard, then Madison will eat it)
- Madison will eat pudding only if the pudding is a custard. (equivalently: If Madison is eating pudding, then it must be a custard)
- Madison will eat pudding if and only if (iff) the pudding is a custard. (equivalently: If the pudding is a custard, then Madison will eat it. AND If Madison is eating pudding, then it must be a custard.)
Analysis
Sentence (1) states only that Madison will eat custard pudding. It does not, however, preclude the possibility that Madison might also have occasion to eat bread pudding. Maybe she will, maybe she won't - the sentence doesn't tell us. All we know for certain is that she'll eat custard pudding.
Sentence (2) states that the only pudding Madison will eat is a custard. It does not, however, preclude the possibility that Madison will refuse a custard if it's made available, in contrast with sentence (1), which requires Madison to eat any available custard.
Sentence (3), however, makes it quite clear that Madison
will eat custard pudding
and custard pudding only. She will eat
all such puddings, and she'll
not eat any other type of pudding.
A further difference is that "if" is used in definitions (except in formal logic); see more below.
Advanced considerations
Philosophical interpretation
A sentence that's composed of two other sentences joined by "iff" is called a
biconditional. "Iff" joins two sentences to form a new sentence. It shouldn't be confused with
logical equivalence which is a description of a relation between two sentences. The biconditional "A
iff B"
uses the sentences
A and
B, describing a relation between the states of affairs
A and
B describe. By contrast "
A is logically equivalent to
B" mentions both sentences: it describes a relation between those two sentences, and not between whatever matters they describe.
The distinction is a very confusing one, and has led many a philosopher astray. Certainly it's the case that when
A is logically equivalent to
B, "A
iff B" is true. But the converse doesn't hold. Reconsidering the sentence:
» Madison will eat pudding if and only if it's custard.
There is clearly no logical equivalence between the two halves of this particular biconditional. For more on the distinction, see
W. V. Quine's
Mathematical Logic, Section 5.
One way of looking at A if and only if B is that it means A if B (B implies A) and A only when B (not B implies not A). Not B implies not A means A implies B, so then we get two way implication.
Definitions
In philosophy and logic, "iff" is used to indicate
definitions, since definitions are supposed to be
universally quantified biconditionals. In mathematics and elsewhere, however, the word "if" is normally used in definitions, rather than "iff". This is due to the observation that "if" in the English language has a definitional meaning, separate from its meaning as a propositional conjunction. This separate meaning can be explained by noting that a definition (for instance: A
group is "abelian" if it satisfies the commutative law; or: A grape is a "raisin" if it's well dried) isn't an equivalence to be proved, but a rule for interpreting the term defined.
(Some authors, nevertheless, explicitly indicate that the "if" of a definition means "iff"!)
Examples
Here are some examples of true statements that use "iff" - true biconditionals (the first is an example of a definition, so it should normally have been written with "if"):
A person is a bachelor iff that person is a marriageable man who has never married.
"Snow is white" (in English) is true iff "Schnee ist weiß" (in German) is true.
For any p, q, and r: (p & q) & r iff p & (q & r). (Since this is written using variables and "&", the statement would usually be written using "↔", or one of the other symbols used to write biconditionals, in place of "iff").
For any real numbers x and y, x=y+1 iff y=x−1.
Analogs
Other words are also sometimes emphasized in the same way by repeating the last letter; for example orr for "Or and only Or" (the exclusive disjunction).
The statement "(A iff B)" is equivalent to the statement "(not A or B) and (not B or A)," and is also equivalent to the statement "(not A and not B) or (A and B)."
More general usage
Iff is used outside the field of logic, wherever logic is applied, especially in mathematical discussions. It has the same meaning as above: it's an abbreviation for if and only if, indicating that one statement is both necessary and sufficient for the other. This is an example of mathematical jargon. (However, as noted above, if, rather than iff, is more often used in statements of definition.)
The elements of X are all and only the elements of Y is used to mean: "for any z in the domain of discourse, z is in X if and only if z is in Y."
Further Information
Get more info on 'If And Only If'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://if_and_only_if.totallyexplained.com">If and only if Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |